He was
tried, convicted and sentenced to death in 1979. He has languished on
death row; burning up his appeals through the Supreme Court level for
more than 20 years since; at the cost of thousands of dollars in
legal man hours.
He is the
darling of the Hollywood anti-death-penalty crowd. His defenders were
everywhere except the courtroom in which he was tried. That makes
them all experts in assigning sainthood to “Tookie”.
The man
founded a street gang that is responsible for the deaths of
thousands. There are cells of this group nationwide and one of his
sons is in jail in a “like-father-like-son” scenario that would
sadden the most compassionate heart.
He
continually asserts his innocence. Every appeal failed. His original
trial failed. His final appeal to the Supreme Court failed; because;
he did it. He personally killed four people; brutally shooting one in
the back. It does not matter what he says. Murderers always say they
did not do what it is they did.
It is said
that he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. This is true even
though anyone can be nominated for that prize. Yasser Arafat was a
known murderer and he actually won the prize. I believe that sort of
diminishes that part of the argument.
It is said
that “Tookie” has written books that are messages to gang-bangers
to stop their dealings in drugs and death. Thank you, Mr. Williams. I
believe your execution will be more of a deterrent to such types
though. If they see all the support you receive; being a murderer;
and yet the Governor of the state agrees with the results of the
appeals and the decisions of the Supreme Court and allows the
execution anyway, the gang-bangers will see there is no chance should
they remain in their lives of crime. Perhaps then they will put down
their guns and knives and decide to be productive members of society.
It is
understood that there are those against the death penalty. Were they
against “Tookie” shooting a poor innocent person in the back?
Have they shown any concern for the families of the four who were
killed by this man or the families of the hundreds of others who have
had children killed in the cold-blooded gang wars sanctioned by this
man’s founded group?
I have
little sympathy for a man who says he has changed, yet says he will
not “rat” on anyone. He knows of others who have murdered but
will not name names. He will not allow any closure for any of the
killed he personally has been involved with. He was convicted in 1979
and according to prison officials led his own prison gang and kept up
matters with the “Crips” through 1994. We are left to wonder how
many of the deaths between 1979 and 1994 can be attributed directly
to “Tookie’s” group.
At any
time during that time did Mr. Williams disown his gang? As a
co-founding father of the Crips, do you think he could have convinced
them to disband or turn themselves in?
It is said
that if he is permitted to live, his continued writing could save
thousands of lives. I believe if he renounced the Crips and turned in
the murderers he could save even more lives. Mr. Williams says he
will not do that though. So it is important that his execution be an
example to all those now standing on that gang-banger fence;
preparing to jump on the side of death.
The
defenders of Mr. Williams need some perspective. They stand on the
side of one man who killed 4 innocent people. Last years there were
more than 16,000 murders in the United States and fewer than 10 of
the murderers were put to death for those crimes. More than 15,000
people did not receive justice. They were killed, but they were
innocent. The defenders of Mr. Williams see “Tookie” as the
innocent one while his victims rot in their graves for no other
reason than having gotten in the man’s way.
The
sympathy for Stanley “Tookie” Williams seems to be misplaced.
Author's Note: This was
the first of two columns I posted about “Tookie” Williams under
my pseudonym Samuel Sandbaugh. It appeared in
www.useless-knowledge.com
in September 2005 I believe. The only edit is to the title reference
“DEATH PENALTY”
No comments:
Post a Comment